I hope this one doesn’t come off looking like a bad advertising insert in your favorite hunting magazine, but it does seem like now is a good time to think about adding a few new pieces of gear to your kit… unless, like me, you’re already well into your hunting season. Maybe I should’ve written this one sooner.
Oh well…
I’ve had the opportunity over the summer to put my hands on a couple of new products.
First is the Black Hole archery target.

I received a press release announcing the release of this new target just as my older target, The Block, was breathing its last (so to speak). I needed a replacement, but I wanted something that would stand up to the big, Magnus broadheads I shoot from my recurve.
Most of the targets I’d tried so far, including the Block, withstood the heavy onslaught of field points I generally sling, but when I started putting those two-blade daggers into the foam, I’d remove slices with almost every shot. I totally destroyed my 3-D Delta deer, cutting it clean in half in the first six months I had it. The Block held up better, but the target face was completely gone after a year.
I received a test sample of the Black Hole early this spring, and started shooting right away. As I’d feared, big slivers of foam came out each time I retrieved one of the broadheads from the target. Still, the foam compressed and “self-healed” over the cut as it is supposed to do. I didn’t shoot as much over the summer as I’d planned, but the target seems to be in pretty good shape.
One of the things I particularly like about the Black Hole target is that it has a bunch of small aiming points of various sizes scattered across the target face, instead of the consistently spaced and sized bullseyes on some other block-styled targets. To me, this lets me focus on picking a spot every time, rather than simply relying on spatial relationships (just aim at the center of the box) and getting lazy. With other targets, once you figure out where the bull is, it’s easy to just start point shooting… a big mistake when you switch from targets to live animals.
You can order the Black Hole for under $70 for a 24″x20″x14″ target, which is about par for this type of target.
The other item I had a chance to play with a bit this summer was a Konus Pro 3-9×44mm rifle scope.

I’d initially contacted the Konus press representatives in order to try out one of their scopes on a project rifle I’d planned to put together for a hog hunt and article. For the project, I was planning to use a rifle in the new .480 Ruger chambering, so I wanted something that would withstand a serious recoil. Konus has engraved their reticle directly into the glass of the scope, so it should be impossible to dislodge the crosshairs…making it a good choice for a hard-kicking rifle.
Unfortunately, the rifle part of the deal never came together, so the scope sat in the box on my desk for quite some time.
Finally, I decided to replace the old Tasco 3-9×50mm on a Browning A-bolt 270, since the Tasco seemed to have some fogginess at higher magnification. I used to be a big fan of Tasco scopes, but the last two I purchased sort of let me down.
The Konus is in the same price-range as the Tasco, retailing in the sub-$200 range (MSRP on the unit I tested is about $149), so I figured a comparison of these two should be fair.
I found the clarity and brightness of the Konus to be a bit above that of the Tasco, even though the Tasco offers a 50mm objective vs the 44mm on the Konus. I also thought the Konus maintained that clarity much better than the Tasco as I increased the magnification. I even checked it against a couple of other Tasco scopes in my cabinet, and found that it was consistently clearer and brighter.
Finally, I pulled out one of my Leupold VX-II scopes, in 3-9×40, just to see how the Konus stacked up against a higher-priced competitor. From my unscientific perspective, and to my surprise, it measured up very nicely.
I really had no good way to test the recoil-resistance of the scope, since the .270 barely kicks at all. However, Konus offers a great guarantee to anyone who breaks the reticle, but since it is engraved into the glass, it seems unlikely that anyone will collect on that one.
Another new product, at least for me, is the Magnus Stinger, four-blade broadheads.

I’ve been shooting Magnus two-blade broadheads since I started bowhunting, about three years ago. They seem to perform well, although I’ve yet to harvest a big game animal with the bow. The blades are very strong, though, and hold an edge through a good bit of abuse. I actually shot one through a board and into a cinderblock wall, chipping the cinderblock without doing any damage to the blade. That’s tough!
Anyway, I always liked the idea of the added cutting surface of a four-blade head, and the Magnus Stinger, with the bleeder blades looked like a good match. I sent a trial packet to my brother, and after his success on a NC whitetail, I decided to try them myself.
I had been shooting a 140 grain head, but the closest I could find in the Stinger is a 150 grain. It wouldn’t hurt me to go up a little, since I’m planning to use these on elk next month. That will take my total arrow weight up to around 549 grains (draw weight is 52lbs), and can only improve my penetration.
In target practice so far, the Stingers have performed wonderfully. I barely noticed a difference in the trajectory or impact over the 140 grain field points I have been shooting. I also found that they don’t plane like the two-blades when I flub my release…as long as I don’t flub it too bad. The two-blades were really sensitive to that, which makes sense, I guess.
Anyway, the true test will come in two weeks, when I will try to slip one of these broadheads behind the shoulder of a Colorado elk. I’ll be sure and report back on that.
Finally, I just want to mention the products from Gun Safety Innovations.
I don’t do a lot of treestand hunting since I’ve moved to California, but it was almost all I ever did back in North Carolina, and it’s what I do whenever I go back for whitetails. Generally, I’d use a plain old piece of parachute cord to pull my gun or bow into the tree, and that seemed good enough. But once the gun is up there, I’d untie it. More than once, I came real close to dropping my rifle from the stand (particularly after nodding off on a slow afternoon). My brother actually did drop his rifle once, muzzle-down in the mud. It cost him a deer that afternoon, but could have cost him much worse.
Gun Safety Innovations has developed and is marketing the Gunslinger, a simple but innovative piece of safety equipment, designed to keep your rifle off of the ground. It’s basically a shock-absorbing safety line that attaches unobtrusively to your gunstock.
It’s a great idea, but one of the drawbacks is that many of us, especially in the southeast, hunt from stands that are waaayy up in the tree, and the Gunslinger is too short for our purposes. Not to worry, now you can get the Gunslinger Extender.
Read more about Gunslinger and the Extender on Kristine’s blog, Hunt Smart, Think Safety.
Well, that should keep your credit card busy for a little while.