Just saw where Tom at the Black Bear Blog posted up about the Missouri hog problems. Apparently the state was hoping that hunters would be able to control the spread of wild hogs, but it doesn’t seem to be working.
I’ve been following this and similar stories around the country, and I’m amazed at some of the innovative ideas that wildlife managers have been putting forth. None has been quite as surprising as the idea of putting electronic tracking beacons on trapped hogs, and then letting them lead hunters to the rest of the herd. Intriguing, but I don’t know that many sport hunters are going to be interested in that approach.
That’s where the whole idea of using sport hunters to manage the explosive spread of wild hogs falls short. We (hunters) are not the right tool for this job.
Don’t get me wrong, I think that every state should do as much as it can to provide hunters the opportunity to help with the eradication, or at least the control of these animals. Hunters have a role and responsibility as stewards of the environment. Where it’s realistic, letting sport hunters kill a percentage of the population is much more economical than paying professionals to do the same job.
However, there are a lot of limitations that come with the whole idea of sportsmanship and hunter ethics that are contrary to the goals of an eradication program. While it may not seem like such a big deal, it’s no mean feat to separate a lifelong hunter from deeply held ethical standards. I still remember when the state of North Carolina began allowing, and then encouraging the take of does. After nearly 50 years of shooting bucks only, it was a tough transition for a lot of hunters to make. I remember how deeply it was drilled into me by both my father and my grandfather to, “make damned sure he’s got horns before you shoot!”
Eradication and population reduction hunting are an even bigger stretch on traditional hunting values. In order to make a solid impact on the populations, hunters will have to do things we’d not ordinarily choose. For example, the take of “wet” sows has always been discouraged among sport hunters because killing the sow usually means the death of the piglets as well. Likewise, to reduce populations hunters need to shoot more small pigs, especially the gilts (young sows that have not yet bred). Most hunters would be ashamed to show up back at camp with a 30 or 40 lb pig over their backs. In many cases, eradication also means that hunters will have to shoot more animals than they care to eat.
Wild hogs are extraordinary animals. Their fecundity is second only to some rodents. A mature sow can have up to three litters per year, and they reach sexual maturity at around eight months of age. This means that you can see two generations breeding in the space of a year. When a litter of pigs can range from six to 12 babies, this adds up pretty fast. Hunters can’t keep up, especially when, for most of them, hogs are incidental during other hunting seasons.
I love any and all opportunities to hunt hogs, but the fact is that sport hunting is not the solution for the explosion of wild hogs across this country. That’s a job for the professionals.