<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Large Predators: Them And Us!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://californiahuntingtoday.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/31/large-predators-them-and-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://californiahuntingtoday.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/31/large-predators-them-and-us/</link>
	<description>Online Hunting Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Alberti</title>
		<link>http://californiahuntingtoday.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/31/large-predators-them-and-us/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Alberti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiahuntingtoday.com/blog/?p=24#comment-962</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed reading this article and I would like to encourage my friends and acquaintances to read it. However, I noticed several misprints or confusing statements.

Paragraph 10, line 3 (I think) should read &quot;...Without it we may not be.&quot;

Paragraph 12, line 11 should read &quot;foremost on survival in &#039;a&#039; sea...&quot;

Paragraph 16, line 1 should be &quot;...eastward...&quot; not &quot;westward&quot;

Paragraph 23, line 5 should read &quot;...compared &#039;with&#039; their Siberian...&quot;

Paragraph 27, line 3 should read &quot;with &#039;the&#039; plight of their subjects &#039;than&#039; concerned...&quot; (take out &quot;with&quot;)

Paragraph 28, line 7 - wolves biting &quot;machinery&quot;? Huh?

Paragraph 28, line 8 - change &quot;is&quot; to &quot;was&quot; to match past tense &quot;died&quot;

Paragraph 29, line 1 should read &quot;...detested as &#039;a&#039; source...&quot;

Paragraph 29, line 2 - change &quot;resettles&quot; to &quot;resettled&quot;

Paragraph 29, line 5 - &quot;throughout&quot; is one word

I&#039;m not trying to be nit-picky, just trying to help the cause. Once the errors are corrected, please feel free to delete this comment. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed reading this article and I would like to encourage my friends and acquaintances to read it. However, I noticed several misprints or confusing statements.</p>
<p>Paragraph 10, line 3 (I think) should read &#8220;&#8230;Without it we may not be.&#8221;</p>
<p>Paragraph 12, line 11 should read &#8220;foremost on survival in &#8216;a&#8217; sea&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Paragraph 16, line 1 should be &#8220;&#8230;eastward&#8230;&#8221; not &#8220;westward&#8221;</p>
<p>Paragraph 23, line 5 should read &#8220;&#8230;compared &#8216;with&#8217; their Siberian&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Paragraph 27, line 3 should read &#8220;with &#8216;the&#8217; plight of their subjects &#8216;than&#8217; concerned&#8230;&#8221; (take out &#8220;with&#8221;)</p>
<p>Paragraph 28, line 7 &#8211; wolves biting &#8220;machinery&#8221;? Huh?</p>
<p>Paragraph 28, line 8 &#8211; change &#8220;is&#8221; to &#8220;was&#8221; to match past tense &#8220;died&#8221;</p>
<p>Paragraph 29, line 1 should read &#8220;&#8230;detested as &#8216;a&#8217; source&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Paragraph 29, line 2 &#8211; change &#8220;resettles&#8221; to &#8220;resettled&#8221;</p>
<p>Paragraph 29, line 5 &#8211; &#8220;throughout&#8221; is one word</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to be nit-picky, just trying to help the cause. Once the errors are corrected, please feel free to delete this comment. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

